Strata scheme CTS 34087
CTS 34087 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Casino Towers [2026] QBCCMCmr 86
Building defects QBCCMCmr 26 March 2026
GENERAL MEETING MOTION – whether a motion to change billing arrangements for chilled water for air conditioning in lots was valid – whether the new arrangement complies with the legislative requirements for utility service charges – whether the consideration of the motion was procedurally defective – whether the decision was unreasonable. Act, ss 94, 195, 196; Standard Module, ss 87, 90
Casino Towers [2026] QBCCMCmr 83
Other QBCCMCmr 17 March 2026
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted Act, s279
Casino Towers [2024] QBCCMCmr 253
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 4 July 2024
MAINTENANCE – whether maintenance of a particular window in a body corporate scheme established under a building format plan of subdivision is the responsibility of the body corporate or the applicant lot owner. Act, s 152; Standard Module, ss 180, 211
Casino Towers [2022] QBCCMCmr 444
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 7 December 2022
Whether interim order preventing resolutions carried at EGM from being implemented is warranted. Validity of EGM; validity of motions purportedly carried at EGM; composition of committee – whether valid; major spending – whether authorised. Act, s 279; Accommodation Module, ss 11(2), 36(2)(c), 40, 72(1), 163
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.