Strata scheme CTS 34812
CTS 34812 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Yatala Central [2024] QBCCMCmr 66
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 22 February 2024
REASONABLENESS; GENERAL MEETING RESOLUTIONS – where a general meeting voted to change the opening hours of an automatic gate that allows vehicles to enter the car park – where the applicant proposed alternative opening hours that would have better suited his tenant’s business but his motion failed – whether the body corporate acted unreasonably – whether the applicant’s motion should be given effect. Act, ss 94(1)(a)&(2), 270(1)(c)&(3).
Yatala Central [2023] QBCCMCmr 462
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 24 November 2023
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – where a general meeting voted to change the opening hours of an automatic gate that allows vehicles to enter the car park – where the applicant proposed alternative opening hours that would better suit the business operations of his tenant but his motion failed – where the applicant argues that the body corporate acted unreasonably and failed to properly substantiate its claims in its explanatory note – whether the opening hours proposed by the applicant or the opening hours formerly in effect at the scheme should be implemented on an interim basis while the application is decided. Act, ss 94(2), 279(1).
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.