Strata scheme CTS 35568
CTS 35568 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 7 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $6,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 7 matters.
Litigation · 7 matters
Glenhaven Estate [2025] QBCCMCmr 4
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 8 January 2025
ADMINISTRATOR – where Glenhaven Estate has no valid body corporate committee or body corporate manager exercising the powers of the committee and the 2024 annual general meeting is overdue; whether to appoint an administrator to call and conduct an annual general meeting. Act, ss 276(4), 278, 301; Standard Module, ss 7, 9(4), 13(1), 16(4), 38(4), 74(2)(b)-(c).
Glenhaven Estate [2024] QBCCMCmr 422
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 18 November 2024
COMMITTEE COMPOSITION; GENERAL MEETINGS – validity; BODY CORPORATE PROPERTY – whether body corporate has validly requested the return of body corporate property from its body corporate manager. Act, s 120(3); Standard Module, ss 13, 38, 41, 74, 76, 235
Glenhaven Estate [2024] QBCCMCmr 177
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 14 May 2024
BODY CORPORATE RECORDS; GENERAL MEETING PROCEDURES – whether the body corporate was entitled to deny the applicant a copy of legal advice it obtained on motions he submitted to a general meeting; whether an AGM should be reconvened because the body corporate failed to circulate the explanatory notes to the applicant’s motions; whether the applicant’s motions were unlawful or unenforceable; whether all general meetings must be held at a physical location that owners may attend in person. Act, ss 97, 276(4), 278, 301; Standard Module, ss 86(1), 87(3)(e), 90(1)(a), 92(1), 98(1)(a), 99(2)&(5), 109(2)(a), 232.
Glenhaven Estate [2024] QBCCMCmr 93
Other QBCCMCmr 12 March 2024
BODY CORPORATE PROPERTY – whether the body corporate has validly requested the return of body corporate property from its body corporate manager - whether the manager has failed to comply with the request – BODY CORPORATE MANAGER – whether other orders are warranted regarding the conduct of the body corporate manager. Standard Module, s 235
Glenhaven Estate [2023] QBCCMCmr 378
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 28 September 2023
COMMITTEE COMPOSITION – whether person elected to committee was a service contractor & became ineligible to hold that position. COSTS – whether application is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or without substance; whether costs should be awarded Act, ss 15, 99, 100(4), 152, 270(1)(c), 285; Standard Module, ss 10(2)(a), 44(2)(b), 48, 97, 98, 180
Glenhaven Estate [2023] QBCCMCmr 363
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 15 September 2023
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether an annual general meeting should be postponed because the applicant may have wished to add further motions to the agenda if he had been given access to the body corporate’s records when requested, or because his explanatory notes were not circulated to owners. Act, ss 276(4), 279(1), 301; Standard Module, ss 86(6), 87(3)(e), 90(1)(a), 97, 98(1)(a)(i), 232(1).
Glenhaven Estate [2021] QBCCMCmr 416
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 2 September 2021
GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – where the applicant disputes the decision of the body corporate not to pass certain motions and to pass other motions – whether the outcome of those motions should be reversed – whether the applicant disputes the decision of the chairperson to rule motions out of order – whether a new meeting should be called to consider those motions – COSTS – whether the application should be dismissed as frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or without substance – whether costs should be awarded to the respondent. Act, ss 94, 270
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 7 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.