Strata scheme CTS 36245
CTS 36245 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 5 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,600
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 5 matters.
Litigation · 5 matters
Ilanah Aqua [2023] QBCCMCmr 356
By-laws QBCCMCmr 11 September 2023
BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT – where body corporate alleges owners of a lot are breaching the by-laws – whether the body corporate has complied with the mandatory legislative processes required to enforce by-laws – whether it appears adjudicator is without jurisdiction. Act, ss 94, 100(5), 181-188, 270(1)(a)
Ilanah Aqua [2023] QBCCMCmr 167
By-laws QBCCMCmr 21 April 2023
BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT – whether respondent lot owner breached by-laws by failing to get written approval to install an outdoor blind – whether body corporate acted reasonably in requiring removal of the unauthorised outdoor blind where blind does not meet certain colour specifications. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5)
Ilanah Aqua [2023] QBCCMCmr 104
Other QBCCMCmr 10 March 2023
REASONABLENESS – whether body corporate committee acted reasonably in investigating the capacity of the scheme’s existing electrical infrastructure to support electric vehicle chargers. Act, ss 94, 100(5), 152 and 159
Ilanah Aqua [2022] QBCCMCmr 200
By-laws QBCCMCmr 27 May 2022
BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT – where a by-law requires approval for renovations to a lot – where the respondents installed a security screen door without approval – whether the security screen door should be removed Act, ss 94, 182, 184
Ilanah Aqua [2020] QBCCMCmr 224
Other QBCCMCmr 30 April 2020
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 5 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.