Strata scheme CTS 39623
CTS 39623 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 1 tribunal matter. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT).
Litigation · 1 matter
Etro Metroplex on Gateway [2020] QBCCMCmr 204
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 24 April 2020
COMMON PROPERTY - Installation of air conditioning unit partly on common property – whether an improvement to common property Whether permission of the body corporate required Commercial Module s 120 STATUTORY EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE where an occupier has installed utility infrastructure partly on common property -whether the body corporate was entitled to refuse permission BCCM Act s 68; Land Title Act 1994, s 115O REASONABLENESS– whether body corporate has acted reasonably in performance of its functions. BCCM Act ss 94, 100. Riverford [[2018] QBCCMCmr 606](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2018/606.html "View Case") Summertree [[2017] QBCCMCmr 111](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2017/111.html "View Case") Miles & Anor v Body Corp for Solarus Residential [[2016] QCATA 130](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCATA/2016/130.html "View Case") Beaches Surfers Paradise v Backshall [[2016] QCATA 177](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCATA/2016/177.html "View Case") Ainsworth v Albrect [[2016] HCA 40](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2016/40.html "View Case") at [[49]](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2016/40.html#para49).
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 1 matter | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.