Strata scheme CTS 4428
CTS 4428 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Raquel Court [2023] QBCCMCmr 435
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 8 November 2023
INSURANCE – whether the body corporate is entitled to recover an insurance excess payment from the applicant in relation to damage caused by the applicant’s tenant to common property and/or another lot. COMMITTEE RESOLUTIONS – whether committee members had a conflict of interest in relation to motions to allow several lots, including theirs, to park on common property – whether the motions purported to allow owners to obstruct common property in contravention of the by-laws. Act, ss 94(1)(a), 100(5); Standard Module, ss 66(1)-(2), 166(1)(c), 203(3)-(4).
Raquel Court [2023] QBCCMCmr 222
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 9 June 2023
BY-LAWS – NUISANCE - whether the respondents are parking vehicles on common property in breach of the by-laws and the legislation. Act, ss 167, 182-188
Raquel Court [2022] QBCCMCmr 284
Insurance QBCCMCmr 1 August 2022
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from denying the applicant a vote, or pursuing further recovery action, until a dispute can be resolved about the applicant’s liability for an excess payment on a claim against the body corporate’s insurance. Act, ss 229A(3), 279; Standard Module, ss 64, 67, 102(2), 203.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.