Strata scheme CTS 46485
CTS 46485 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Addison Quays [2025] QBCCMCmr 42
Nuisance and behaviour QBCCMCmr 5 February 2025
NUISANCE – ORDERS The applicant body corporate complains that the respondent lot owner has for some years caused nuisance by persistently sending communications to the committee and other lot owners about disputed issues. The body corporate seeks orders limiting the respondent’s communications with other owners and absolving the committee from an obligation to respond to certain types of his communications. The questions are: whether such conduct can be characterised as unlawful nuisance; and if so, whether the requested orders are in appropriate form to be made. COSTS The applicant seeks an order for reimbursement by the respondent of its application costs because the preceding conciliation session was ended on the basis that the respondent did not make a reasonable attempt to participate in conciliation. The question is whether a costs order is warranted in the circumstances. Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997: ss 167, 280 Proximity One [[2016] QBCCMCmr 416](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2016/416.html "View Case") Drift Palm Cove [[2021] QBCCMCmr 149](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2021/149.html "View Case")
Addison Quays [2023] QBCCMCmr 226
Other QBCCMCmr 13 June 2023
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. REFEREE POWERS – whether Referee can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act, s 279.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.