Strata scheme CTS 46784
CTS 46784 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Circa Metro [2024] QBCCMCmr 342
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 19 September 2024
REASONABLENESS; UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE – The applicant paid a plumber to unblock a drain that turned out to be common property. The committee refused to reimburse the expenditure because it was not satisfied the item that blocked the drain had been there since the construction of the scheme. The applicant argues the committee acted unreasonably and its decision should be reversed. Act, ss 20, 100(7), 280; Accommodation Module, s 170(1); Land Title Act 1994, ss 48C, 49C(4).
Circa Metro [2024] QBCCMCmr 49
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 8 February 2024
Utility infrastructure – where a drain located on common property is blocked – whether the drain is a body corporate responsibility to maintain – whether the committee’s decision to refuse reimbursement to unblock the drain was unreasonable. Act, ss 20, 94(2); Accommodation Module, ss 170(4)
Circa Metro [2023] QBCCMCmr 205
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 26 May 2023
MANAGEMENT OF COMMON PROPERTY – whether body corporate is failing to manage common property visitor carpark reasonably and for the benefit of lot owners – whether committee members are breaching code of conduct. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5), 152
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.