Strata scheme CTS 5030
CTS 5030 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 5 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,600
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 5 matters.
Litigation · 5 matters
Casablanca Palms [2026] QBCCMCmr 97
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 11 May 2026
PROPERTY DAMAGE – whether property damage was caused by the body corporate’s failure to maintain the common property – whether property damage was caused by the lot owner’s failure to maintain the lot REASONABLENESS – whether the body corporate acted unreasonably in apportioning the costs of property damage and the insurance excess to a lot owner Act, ss 94, 100, 152, 160, 276 and 281; Standard Module, ss 180, 203 and 211
Casablanca Palms [2023] QBCCMCmr 135
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 27 March 2023
ACCESS TO A LOT – whether the body corporate seeks access to a lot to repair a common property pipe – where access has not been given – whether orders are warranted. Act, s 163
Casablanca Palms [2021] QBCCMCmr 456
Other QBCCMCmr 1 October 2021
VOTING – where count of votes on motion did not include vote purportedly sent by post by applicant – where body corporate says voting paper was never received – where vote tied and therefore motion failed to pass – whether vote validly cast – whether to declare motion passed Standard Module, ss 105, 221
Casablanca Palms [2021] QBCCMCmr 457
By-laws QBCCMCmr 1 October 2021
BY-LAWS – APPROVAL – where lot owner’s installation failed to gain approval at AGM or by adjudication – where owner submitted another AGM motion and won approval – where body corporate simultaneously seeks order for removal of installation based on earlier refusal – whether to order installation be removed. Act, s 276(1)
Casablanca Palms [2021] QBCCMCmr 216
Other QBCCMCmr 5 May 2021
INTERIM ORDER – whether to grant interim order. Act, s 279
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 5 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.