← Back to the full dossier
StrataAuditor Public-record dossier

Strata scheme CTS 52238

CTS 52238 Queensland

Verdict

Public record: 1 tribunal matter. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

Cost exposure

Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Low
Good case $500 per lot
Expected $3,000 per lot
Worst case $10,000 per lot
  • Tribunal and legal costs

    Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT).

    $3,000

Litigation · 1 matter

  • One Palm Beach [2024] QBCCMCmr 466

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 16 December 2024

    DISMISSAL – ADJUDICATORS POWER The applicant lot owners allege the respondent body corporate failed to maintain common property, and that the applicants have thereby suffered property damage and economic loss. The applicants seek orders that the body corporate compensate them for repair costs so incurred and remedy the applicants’ economic losses. The parties note that an adjudicator lacks power to make the requested maintenance order to the extent the cost exceeds the monetary limit for an adjudicator’s order, and contend that an adjudicator also lacks power to make the requested order for economic loss. The parties agree that the issues are so complicated as to be unsuitable for decision in this jurisdiction, and that there is another related dispute with a separate party. The question for determination is whether it is appropriate to dismiss the application on the basis that the dispute should be dealt with in a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction. Act, s 270(1)(b)

Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelLand registryStub onlyNot harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts1 matterDirectNot harvested here yet
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersOutside current coverageNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public record, and no registry entry for this schemeNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.

Compiled by StrataAuditor from Queensland titles register and the relevant licence registers. Litigation from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. Records only, as published; unknowns are shown as unknowns.

Coverage caveat: this reflects only what is on the public record for Queensland at the time of generation. An empty matters or orders count is not a clean bill: fund balances, current levies, minutes, and defects not yet litigated are never on the public record. Obtain the strata report before you bid.

Public-record summary, not legal or financial advice.

Generated 3 July 2026 · StrataAuditor

strataauditor.com/building/qld:CTS52238