Strata scheme CTS 52802
CTS 52802 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $8,000
Waterproofing and common-property repair
Indicative per-lot waterproofing and common-property repair levies (strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
The Vue Scarborough [2024] QBCCMCmr 447
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 6 December 2024
REASONABLENESS – whether the body corporate acted unreasonably in refusing to pass motions that would reimburse the applicant for replacing damaged carpets and lost rent following sewage water inundation. JURISDICTION – whether adjudicator has exclusive jurisdiction in the first instance – whether the application seeking reimbursement for lost rental income should be dismissed so it may be heard in a court of competent jurisdiction. Act, s20, 94(2), 270(1)(b); Accommodation Module, ss 170.
The Vue Scarborough [2024] QBCCMCmr 106
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 20 March 2024
GENERAL MEETING MOTION – INSURANCE – whether the body corporate acted reasonably in refusing to reimburse the applicant’s insurance excess payment – whether it was reasonable in all the circumstances for the excess to be paid by the owner of the lot IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – whether the body corporate acted reasonably in refusing to install reflux devices on common property. Act, s 94(2); Accommodation Module, s 193.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.