Strata scheme CTS 5719
CTS 5719 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Ardoch [2022] QBCCMCmr 21
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 24 January 2022
REQUESTED GENERAL MEETING – whether a notice requesting an extraordinary general meeting was valid – whether the meeting was validly called – whether the motions purportedly passed at the meeting were valid Standard Module ss 82, 93
Ardoch [2021] QBCCMCmr 348
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 16 July 2021
VALIDITY OF EGM RESOLUTION AND/ OR RESOLUTIONS OF THE EGM- whether resolutions to engage legal firm to undertake legal work were valid – where work had already been undertaken. INTERIM ORDER – Application for interim order– whether warranted in circumstances\_.\_ SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") ABC v O’Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act, s 279;
Ardoch [2021] QBCCMCmr 304
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 23 June 2021
EGM PROCEDURES & RESOLUTIONS – whether an EGM was invalid because there was no committee resolution to call it or set the agenda; whether a motion to engage a law firm should have presented owners with a choice between at least 2 quotations; whether a motion authorising a committee member to instruct the law firm without consultation with other owners invalidly sought to delegate the body corporate’s powers; whether the body corporate should be prevented from paying the law firm until it has been properly engaged by resolution of the body corporate. Act, s 97; Standard Module, ss 55, 68(1), 82(1), 93, 116, 173.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.