Strata scheme CTS 5907
CTS 5907 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 5 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,600
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 5 matters.
Litigation · 5 matters
Rainbow Bay Resort [2024] QBCCMCmr 287
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 7 August 2024
BY-LAW – where the respondent commenced significant renovation works on her lot – where the body corporate recorded a new by-law relating to works on lots and common property – whether the by-law is valid – whether the respondent required approval for the work – whether the respondent is in breach of the by-law. Act, ss 94, 169, 180, 182-188
Rainbow Bay Resort [2024] QBCCMCmr 189
Other QBCCMCmr 22 May 2024
INTERIM ORDER – whether interim orders are warranted. Act, s 279
Rainbow Bay Resort [2023] QBCCMCmr 504
Other QBCCMCmr 22 December 2023
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
Rainbow Bay Resort [2022] QBCCMCmr 307
Other QBCCMCmr 17 August 2022
INTERIM ORDER – where body corporate has issued a notice of entry to a lot owner – where the lot owner says the notice is non-compliant and the decision was unreasonable – where the lot owner seeks an interim order to restrain entry – where the body corporate says it does not propose to enter the lot if entry is obstructed – whether an interim order is necessary. Act, ss 163, 279
Rainbow Bay Resort [2022] QBCCMCmr 249
Other QBCCMCmr 1 July 2022
INTERIM ORDER – whether interim orders are warranted. Act, s 279
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 5 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.