Strata scheme CTS 8379

CTS 8379 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026

Public record: 13 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

13 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about levies and contributions
$6,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.

13 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.

Cost exposure

Moderate exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $700 per lot

Expected $6,300 per lot

Worst case $24,900 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Tribunal and legal costs 13 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 13 matters.	$700	$6,300	$24,900
Total per lot	$700	$6,300	$24,900

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
What was the levy or contributions dispute about, and are any unfunded works coming?

Because we found a levy/contributions matter on record.
2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 13 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan CTS 8379 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

Ocean Pacifique [2026] QBCCMCmr 161
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 29 May 2026

APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDER – where the applicant seeks to challenge a motion passed at a recent extraordinary general meeting – whether the body corporate acted unreasonably in passing the motion. Act, ss 94, 279
Ocean Pacifique [2023] QBCCMCmr 405
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 19 October 2023

AGM RESOLUTIONS – whether resolutions approving legal proceedings and payment of legal fees and costs should be declared invalid – whether resolutions involved fraud on the minority of lot owners ADMINISTRATOR – where scheme is in substantial non-compliance – whether administrator should be appointed DISMISSAL OF APPLICATION – ABUSE OF PROCESS – whether application should be dismissed for being vexatious and an abuse of process
Ocean Pacifique [2023] QBCCMCmr 371
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 20 September 2023

REASONABLENESS – where the body corporate has passed various resolutions which, amongst other things, increase the scheme’s levies and raise special levies – where the applicant disputes the need for the extra levies and wants an administrator appointed to assess the scheme’s financial position – whether the body corporate has failed to act reasonably in passing the disputed resolutions Act, ss 94(2), 100(4), 242, 270, 301
Ocean Pacifique [2023] QBCCMCmr 342
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 31 August 2023

AGM RESOLUTIONS – whether resolutions approving legal proceedings and payment of legal fees and costs should be declared invalid – whether resolutions involved fraud on the minority of lot owners
Ocean Pacifique [2023] QBCCMCmr 244
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 27 June 2023

INTERIM ORDER – where the body corporate has passed resolutions to increase the scheme’s levies and to raise special levies - whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. REFEREE POWERS – whether Referee can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act, s 279.
Ocean Pacifique [2023] QBCCMCmr 175
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 4 May 2023

APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDER – where the body corporate has passed resolutions to increase the scheme’s levies and to raise special levies – whether there are urgent circumstances to warrant granting an interim order to immediately halt the requirement for all owners to make payment of all levies Act, ss 94, 106, 110, 279
Ocean Pacifique [2023] QBCCMCmr 10
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 16 January 2023

Validity of general meeting motions; whether the body corporate acted unreasonably in passing disputed motions. Act, s 94(2); Accommodation Module, ss 79, 156(2), 163, 176.
Ocean Pacifique [2022] QBCCMCmr 258
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 11 July 2022

Application for interim order to prevent disputed general meeting resolutions from being implemented – whether warranted in the circumstances. Act, ss 94(2), 279; Accommodation Module, ss 18(2)(b), 74
Ocean Pacifique [2022] QBCCMCmr 255
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 7 July 2022

Whether a person should be appointed as administrator; whether the committee was properly composed; whether contributions levied on owners are unreasonable. Act, s 301; Accommodation Module, ss 10, 150.
Ocean Pacifique [2022] QBCCMCmr 5
Other QBCCMCmr 10 January 2022

Whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. Act, s 279.
Ocean Pacifique [2021] QBCCMCmr 367
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 28 July 2021

Whether owner owed a body corporate debt at time of AGM – debt dispute. Act, s 279A
Ocean Pacifique [2020] QBCCMCmr 21
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 16 January 2020

APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM ORDER – where two annual general meetings were purportedly held in the same month, resulting in two purported committees – whether one committee or the other should administer the scheme in the interim – where repairs are urgently required and body corporate bills need to be settled – whether the nature or urgency of the circumstances require an order to be made – whether there are serious questions of law and the balance of convenience falls in favour of the applicants. Act, ss 269(3)(b), 269(3)(c), 279(1); Accommodation Module, ss 63(3)(f), 80, 122, 137(6), 138.
Ocean Pacifique [2020] QBCCMCmr 22
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 16 January 2020

APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM ORDER – where two annual general meetings were purportedly held in the same month, resulting in the election of two purported committees – whether one committee or the other should administer the scheme in the interim – where repairs are urgently required and body corporate bills need to be settled – whether the nature or urgency of the circumstances require an order to be made – whether there are serious questions of law and the balance of convenience falls in favour of the applicant. Act, ss 269(3)(b), 269(3)(c), 279(1); Accommodation Module, ss 64, 122.

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	Land registry	Stub only	Not harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	13 matters	Direct	Not harvested here yet
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Outside current coverage	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.