Strata scheme CTS 8790
CTS 8790 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 10 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $6,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 10 matters.
Litigation · 10 matters
Atlantis West [2026] QBCCMCmr 5
Other QBCCMCmr 13 January 2026
ACCESS TO A LOT – where the body corporate has issued an entry notice seeking access to the respondent’s lot to facilitate balustrade replacement works at the scheme – where access has been refused – whether orders for access are required. Act, s 163
Atlantis West [2024] QBCCMCmr 386
Other QBCCMCmr 23 October 2024
ACCESS TO A LOT – whether body corporate is required to compensate owner for inability to use part of the lot whilst works authorised by the body corporate are performed. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5), 156, 163; Standard Module, ss 52, 189
Atlantis West [2024] QBCCMCmr 340
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 18 September 2024
CARETAKING SERVICE CONTRACTOR - ENGAGEMENTS AND AUTHORISATIONS – RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF PROPRIETORS – whether decision of body corporate to extend Caretaking Service Agreement was valid STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – USE OF EXTRINSIC MATERIAL Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld), ss. 94, 122, 227, 229, 318. Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s. 14A, 14B, 32C. Statutory Instruments Act 1992, s 14 Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation 2020 (Qld), ss. 135, 136, 140, 141 Explanatory Notes, Body Corporate and Community Management Legislation Amendment Regulation(No 1) 2003 (Qld) Lill v Ryan [[2011] QCATA 124](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCATA/2011/124.html "View Case") Lacey v Attorney-General (Qld) [[2011] HCA 10](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2011/10.html "View Case"); (2011) 242 CLR 573 Minister for Immigration v SZAYW [[2005] FCAFC 154](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/154.html "View Case"); (2005) 145 FCR 523 Strata Plan No. 74602 v Eastmark Holdings Pty Ltd [](../../../../BCCM/Appeal%20&%20External%20Decisions/External%20decisions/The%20Owners%20-%20Strata%20Plan%20No.%2074602%20v%20Eastmark%20Holdings%20Pty%20Limited%20%5b2013%5d%20NSWCA%20221.pdf)[[2013] NSWCA 221](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2013/221.html "View Case")
Atlantis West [2024] QBCCMCmr 183
Other QBCCMCmr 17 May 2024
ACCESS TO A LOT – where the body corporate issued an entry notice seeking access to the respondent’s lot for an extended period for balustrade replacement works at the scheme – where the respondent objected to the extent of access sought – whether the extent of access sought is reasonably necessary - whether orders for access are required. Act, s 163
Atlantis West [2022] QBCCMCmr 335
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 7 September 2022
AGM RESOLUTION; DISPOSITION OF COMMON PROPERTY – whether the body corporate acted unreasonably when deciding against a motion to grant the applicant a three year licence to part of the common property adjoining its lot; whether the body corporate has acquiesced to the applicant’s use of the area; whether the applicant has an actual or implied licence to the area; where the applicant has had sole use of the area since purchasing at the scheme in 1999. Act, ss 94(2), 242; Standard Module, s 184(2)(b).
Atlantis West [2022] QBCCMCmr 93
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 14 March 2022
RESOLUTION WITHOUT DISSENT – where a motion proposed that exclusive use be granted for benefit of a lot on 16th floor, for use as foyer area– where the motion failed to achieve a resolution without dissent – whether the opposition to the motion was unreasonable in the circumstances. Section 276(3) Act & Schedule 5 Item 10, Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997. Body Corporate for Viridian; Ainsworth & ors v Albrecht & Anor [[2014] QCATA 294](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCATA/2014/294.html "View Case") Ainsworth & Ors v Albrecht & Anor [[2016] HCA 40](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2016/40.html "View Case")
Atlantis West [2022] QBCCMCmr 16
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 19 January 2022
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented, pending final orders, from implementing a general meeting resolution to issue a by-law contravention notice to the applicant and seek the removal of a partition from common property; where the applicant argues that a motion to grant it a licence to the relevant area of common property should be deemed passed, and the motion to issue the contravention notice and remove the partition should be declared invalid. Act, ss 94(2), 101(2), 242, 279; Standard Module, s 184(2)(b).
Atlantis West [2021] QBCCMCmr 341
Other QBCCMCmr 12 July 2021
CHANGE OF FINANCIAL YEAR – application to change the financial year end date of the Body Corporate Act, s 283
Atlantis West [2021] QBCCMCmr 241
Other QBCCMCmr 19 May 2021
RECORDS – where the applicant seeks a copy of specific correspondence to the body corporate – where it was not found in a search of the records – whether the document exists – whether the body corporate has failed to provide access to the records. Act, s 205
Atlantis West [2020] QBCCMCmr 233
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 8 May 2020
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDER – where applicant seeks to invalidate a resolution to appoint a body corporate manager - whether the engagement has been properly authorised by the body corporate- whether an interim order is warranted in the circumstances. Act ss 227, 228, 276, 279.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 10 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.