Strata scheme CTS 9233
CTS 9233 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Severe- $70,000
Combustible cladding rectification
Indicative per-lot cladding special levies of $15k to $220k (StrataClear 2026; ABC News 2025). Program context: NSW Project Remediate. Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Carlisle [2026] QBCCMCmr 163
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 29 May 2026
EXCLUSIVE USE BY-LAW – whether a motion for a new exclusive use by-law attaching to a lot giving exclusive rights to use an area of common property failed to pass by resolution without dissent because of opposition that, in the circumstances, was unreasonable. Act, s 276(3) and Schedule 5 Item 10
Carlisle [2024] QBCCMCmr 209
Building defects QBCCMCmr 5 June 2024
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – where pergolas and glazings (Improvements) installed on the balconies of two lots in or before 2017 do not comply with conditions of body corporate approval, in part because both Improvements have non-compliant combustible cladding as a roof, whether the body corporate resolved to rescind its prior approval for the entirety of the Improvements, whether new approval required. REASONABLENESS – whether the body corporate and committee acted reasonably in making decisions about the Improvements. DISPOSITION OF COMMON PROPERTY – whether pergolas or glazings required authorisation by a resolution without dissent. ADJUDICATOR POWERS – whether it is just and equitable in the circumstances to make orders that the respondents remove the Improvements in their entirety. Act, ss 94, 100(5), 154, 159; Standard Module, ss 184, 187, 192
Carlisle [2021] QBCCMCmr 119
Other QBCCMCmr 16 March 2021
EMERGENCY EXPENDITURE – whether the circumstances give rise to a genuine emergency – whether expenditure above the committee spending limit should be authorised. Act, ss 227, 228, 243A, 276, Schedule 5; Standard Module, ss 172-174, 180(1)
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.