Strata scheme CTS 9374
CTS 9374 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
James Place [2023] QBCCMCmr 410
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 23 October 2023
GENERAL MEETING RESOLUTION; IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY; EXCLUSIVE USE – where the body corporate invalidly purported to grant a lot exclusive use of common property and permission to erect a fence – where the exclusive use resolution was subsequently rescinded and another resolution passed requiring the removal of the fence – where other lots have also been improperly granted exclusive use of common property yet have not had that rescinded nor been required to remove their fences - whether the body corporate acted reasonably in requiring the removal of the fence – whether the resolution ought to be declared void. Act, ss 35(1), 62(2)&(3)(a), 94(2), 337(2)(g), 339(5); Building Units and Group Titles Act 1980, s 30.
James Place [2022] QBCCMCmr 360
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 27 September 2022
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether a general meeting should be postponed because the person who called it lacked authority, or because it will consider a motion to grant exclusive use to the applicants but not to other owners who are also using common property to the exclusion of other owners without proper authority. Act, ss 62(2)&(3)(a), 171(2)(a), 279(1); Accommodation Module, ss 44(1)(d), 72(1), 74(1), 83(1).
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.