Strata scheme CTS 9391
CTS 9391 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Beach Haven Broadbeach [2023] QBCCMCmr 481
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 11 December 2023
UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE – IMPROVEMENT – EASEMENT – MAINTENANCE WHERE: the body corporate wishes to clean high rise building exterior windows and balustrades; the body corporate wishes to install anchor points on the applicant’s lot to occasionally attach abseiling equipment; the body corporate issued a notice of entry to install the anchor points; the applicant lot owners object because they would be permanent installations; the body corporate says alternatives are not financially viable; the parties have agreed to an interim alternative mechanism which does not require installation of the anchor points WHETHER: the entry notice is valid; the anchor points are an improvement to the lot or instead are utility infrastructure; there is an easement over the lot in favour of installing the anchor points; the anchor points are reasonably necessary to supply the cleaning utility service; the body corporate acted unreasonably in deciding to install the anchor points without consent of the owner Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997, ss 158, 163, 68, 94 Land Title Act 1994 (Qld), s 115P
Beach Haven Broadbeach [2023] QBCCMCmr 136
Other QBCCMCmr 28 March 2023
INTERIM ORDER – whether interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.