Strata scheme CTS 9799
CTS 9799 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $8,000
Waterproofing and common-property repair
Indicative per-lot waterproofing and common-property repair levies (strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Carmen Apartments [2024] QBCCMCmr 112
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 25 March 2024
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – whether replacement of gas hot water system with electric hot water system constitutes an improvement to common property – whether statutory easement extinguished – whether body corporate acted reasonably in refusing to approve air conditioning unit as an improvement to common property. GENERAL MEETING MOTION – whether clause in motion purporting to take effect upon that motion failing to pass is valid. Act, ss 68, 70, 94, 187, 280; Land Title Act 1994 (Qld), s 115O
Carmen Apartments [2024] QBCCMCmr 113
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 25 March 2024
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – whether replacement of gas hot water system with electric hot water system constitutes an improvement to common property – whether statutory easement extinguished. GENERAL MEETING MOTION – whether clause in motion purporting to take effect upon that motion failing to pass is valid Act, ss 68, 70; Land Title Act 1994 (Qld), s 115O
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.