Strata scheme CTS 9818
CTS 9818 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Tugun San Simeon [2024] QBCCMCmr 119
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 26 March 2024
GENERAL MEETING MOTION – whether body corporate acted reasonably when it decided at a general meeting to resolve to remove pavers from an area of common property and replace them with grass. Act, ss 94(2), 270(3)
Tugun San Simeon [2023] QBCCMCmr 256
Other QBCCMCmr 10 July 2023
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5)
Tugun San Simeon [2022] QBCCMCmr 114
Building defects QBCCMCmr 23 March 2022
Validity of motion; responsibility for rectification works – whether application is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived and without substance; whether costs should be awarded. Act, ss 270(1)(c), (3); Accommodation Module, ss 170, 177, 178, 182, 201
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.