Strata scheme SP 25819
SP 25819 Western Australia
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
CLAY and THE OWNERS OF CARINYA COURT ROCKINGHAM STRATA PLAN 25819 [2024] WASAT 121
Levies and contributions WASAT 11 November 2024
Strata plan - Scheme dispute - Functions of strata company - Functions of council - General meeting of strata company - Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) - Annual General Meeting (AGM) - Whether notice of AGM invalid - Whether AGM invalid - Whether motions and resolutions passed at AGM void, invalid or should be set aside - Proper management of strata scheme - Financial management - Budget - Who can propose a resolution outside of a general meeting - Proper construction of by-law on debt recovery costs - Tribunal proceedings - Jurisdiction of Tribunal - Dismissing a proceeding - Resolution of scheme dispute - Statutory discretion power to make declarations and orders to resolve scheme dispute or proceeding - History of ongoing dispute
VANE and OWNERS OF CARINYA COURT ROCKINGHAM STRATA SCHEME 25819 [2024] WASAT 40
Building defects WASAT 6 May 2024
Structure - Structural alteration of lot - Whether necessary approval for alteration sought - Whether valid refusal to give necessary approval - Grounds on which approval for structural alterations may be refused - Application to dispense with the requirement for approval of structural alteration of lot - Tribunal proceedings - Whether structural alteration reasonable - Whether structural alteration causes significant inconvenience or detriment to lot owners - Discretion of Tribunal to make orders - Turns on own facts
Decisions naming this scheme, from WASAT via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.