Decisions table
Every strata tribunal matter we hold, across the states, filterable like a database. New South Wales matters are read into structured fields, the parties and their roles, who presided, how it ended, and the money in play. Matters in the other states are catalogued from the tribunal register with their citation, scheme, and source, ahead of the same structured read.
4,026 matters of which 512 read into structured fields
Outcome and money figures are computed over the 512 structured-extract matters in this set, all in New South Wales, the only state read into outcome and amount so far. Matters catalogued from the other registers are not folded into these figures.
| Decision | Parties | Member | Dispute | Outcome | Amount | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bawa v The Owners-Strata Plan No 72125 No 2 [2025] NSWCATAP 211 |
| P Durack SC, Senior Member R Perrignon | Levies and funds | Mixed The appellant was ordered to pay 10% of the respondent's costs of the appeal up to and including the hearing on 28 November 2024, but the respondent's application for its costs of the primary proceedings was dismissed. | — | 2025 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 7114 v Northern Beaches Council [2025] NSWCA 197 |
| Ward P; Stern JA; Free JA | Levies and funds | Respondent successful Appeal dismissed; the Owners Corporation was obliged to pay licence fees under the 1999 Deed while it remained operative, Council is entitled to damages for interference with property rights from the roller door after licence termination, and the Owners Corporation's claim for unpaid electricity charges was statute barred. | — | 2025 |
| Gokani-Robins Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 77109 (No 2) [2025] NSWCATAP 204 |
| D Robertson, Principal Member; R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member | By-laws | Respondent successful The Appeal Panel dismissed the appellants' application for costs and granted the respondent's application for costs, ordering the appellants to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or as assessed. | — | 2025 |
| Owers-Brown v The Owners-Strata Plan No 92562; Nakkan v The Owners-Strata Plan No 92562 [2025] NSWCATCD 67 |
| G Sarginson, Deputy President | Repairs and common property | Mixed The tribunal found timber decking on balconies was common property and ordered the owners corporation to engage licensed builders to perform partial replacement and repair works set out in Schedule A, but rejected the lot owners' broader request for complete removal and replacement of the entire decking system. | — | 2025 |
| The Owners Strata Plan no 73224 v Ikon Realty Pty Ltd t/as Ikon Strata [2025] NSWCATCD 120 |
| Senior Member H Woods | Management and meetings | Respondent successful Application to terminate the strata managing agent agreement was dismissed because Mr Lazarus lacked authority to bring the proceedings, the Owners Corporation had resolved to withdraw the application, and the operative agreement (2024 Agreement) was properly entered into and commenced in September 2024, rendering any order to terminate the earlier 2023 Agreement lacking utility. | — | 2025 |
| The Owners - Strata Plan No 16460 v Hunter Water Corporation [2025] NSWSC 947 |
| Elkaim AJ | Costs and procedure | Applicant successful The plaintiffs were granted leave to amend their statement of claim to add a claim under s 22 of the Hunter Water Act 1991 (NSW), with the plaintiffs to pay the defendant's costs occasioned by the amendment. | — | 2025 |
| AGC Roof Maintenance Pty Limited v The Owners Corporation of Strata Plan 7704 [2025] NSWCATCD 116 | Other NSWCATCD BUILDING CLAIM – non-payment of invoice – breach of contract On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| Griffiths v The Owners – Strata Plan No 11097 [2025] NSWCATCD 125 |
| R Collins, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Mixed The Tribunal ordered that the parties jointly demolish and replace sections A and B of the masonry dividing fence with costs shared equally, that the applicant may clean and repaint its external wall at its own cost, and that the parties construct a new timber fence with costs shared equally. | — | 2025 |
| Akdogan v The Owners - Strata Plan No 55665 [2025] NSWCATCD 114 |
| Dr K M George, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Applicant successful The Tribunal dismissed the Owners Corporation's Miscellaneous Application to set aside or amend the Summons to produce documents relating to the OC's claim against Foreshew in the District Court proceedings. | — | 2025 |
| Feitelson v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 63429 [2025] NSWCATCD 118 |
| Senior Member S. A. McDonald | Repairs and common property | Applicant successful The Tribunal ordered the Owners Corporation to carry out maintenance and repairs to common property to achieve compliance with section 106 of the SSMA, prescribed a new by-law, and declared multiple by-laws invalid. | — | 2025 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 63517 v Titles Strata Management Pty Ltd [2025] NSWCATCD 112 |
| Senior Member Dr D Goldman | Levies and funds | Respondent successful The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the strata management agreement was effectively extended by implication after its expiry date of 30 April 2024 through the conduct of both parties, and that the fees charged by the strata manager in May 2024 were reasonable and properly charged. | — | 2025 |
| Pike v The Owners - Strata Plan No 9370 [2025] NSWCATCD 113 |
| K Merrick, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Mixed The Tribunal invalidated resolutions for fire order works (motions 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 9.2, 9.3) requiring special resolution, dismissed the challenge to the remedial works motion, and varied the special levy payment dates to 28 August, 28 September, and 28 October 2025. | — | 2025 |
| Musumeci v The Owners - Strata Plan No 11583 [2025] NSWCATAP 185 |
| G Blake AM SC, Principal Member; R Titterton OAM, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The appeal against the dismissal of an application for compulsory appointment of a strata managing agent was dismissed; the Appeal Panel found no errors of law by the Senior Member and refused leave to appeal. | — | 2025 |
| Saad v The Owners - Strata Plan No 75928 [2025] NSWCATCD 108 |
| G K Burton SC, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Dismissed The applicant's applications for removal of the strata manager and strata committee and appointment of a compulsory strata manager were dismissed on the grounds that the applicant failed to establish dereliction of duty or dysfunction justifying such extraordinary relief. | — | 2025 |
| The Owners - Strata Plan 69205 v Community Association DP 270244 (No. 3) [2025] NSWCATCD 105 | Costs and procedure NSWCATCD COSTS — Party/Party — where the applicant applied to the Tribunal for the exercise of jurisdiction under both a referral from an Adjudicator pursuant to s 71B of the Community Land Management Act 1989 (NSW) and in the original jurisdiction conferred on the Tribunal by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – where the Tribunal made a decision and gave orders in both jurisdictions – where the Tribunal at first instance made a single costs order without distinguishing the jurisdictio On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| The Owners - Strata Plan No. 3407 v Edgar and Edgar [2025] NSWCATCD 71 |
| Senior Member M Tyson | Repairs and common property | Applicant successful The respondents were ordered to immediately remove a pram and e-bike parked on common property as they constituted a nuisance and hazard in contravention of section 153 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015. | — | 2025 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 100339 v SHLACDZ Pty Ltd t/as S Building & Facility Management [2025] NSWCATCD 107 | G K Burton SC, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The application to terminate or vary the building management agreement was dismissed as the owners corporation failed to establish the required grounds under section 72 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 for removal or variation of the building manager. | — | 2025 | |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 72250 v Nugent [2025] NSWCATAP 183 |
| S Westgarth, Deputy President; R Alkadamani, Senior Member | Levies and funds | Respondent successful The appeal was dismissed and leave to appeal refused; the Tribunal at first instance correctly determined that the Nugent parties' strata levy balances must account for credits of $71,185.24 as at 28 May 2021 in accordance with earlier Tribunal orders. | — | 2025 |
| Owners Corporation No.1 PS540313Q v Eaton [2025] VCAT 674 | Other VCAT Owners Corporations On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| Harvey v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 60850 [2025] NSWCATCD 100 |
| D Goldstein, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Mixed The applicants' claim that the suspended balconies are common property was upheld; DocBay's application was dismissed; the owners corporation was ordered to replace the collapsed balcony to lot 15 within 60 days with identical materials and dimensions, and to pay Teresa Harvey $1,703.18 for expenses incurred in proceedings. | $1,703 | 2025 |
| Sydney Gold Bullion Exchange Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 34794 [2025] NSWCATCD 69 |
| D Robertson, Principal Member | Levies and funds | Respondent successful The application for reallocation of unit entitlements and compensation was dismissed as the applicant failed to establish any breach of duty by the owners corporation or any causation linking alleged breaches to loss. | — | 2025 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No. 58036 v The Estate of William Hutchinson [2025] NSWLEC 76 |
| Beasley J | Repairs and common property | Orders made The court waived the requirement to give notice to the owner of the land on which the tree is situated and ordered that the application proceed ex parte, with the matter to be listed for directions and final hearing allocation. | — | 2025 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan no 74482 v YNW [2025] NSWCATAP 169 |
| S Westgarth, Deputy President; R Alkadamani, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Respondent successful Leave to appeal was refused and the appeal was dismissed; the Tribunal's refusal to adjourn the hearing at first instance was upheld as the Appellant had reasonable opportunity to prepare its case and seek extensions or adjournment earlier. | — | 2025 |
| Kentwell v The Owners Strata Plan No 2056 [2025] NSWCATCD 96 |
| H Woods, Senior Member | By-laws | Applicant successful Special By Law 31 concerning communication protocols was declared invalid pursuant to section 150(1) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 because it is harsh, unconscionable and oppressive in its operation. | — | 2025 |
| OWNERS OF STRATA PLAN 62077 and HANSSEN PTY LTD [2025] WASAT 72 SP 62077 catalogued matter | Other WASAT Application for dismissal of proceeding under s 47 of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA) - Whether deed of settlement and release precludes applicant from pursuing the proceeding On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| Selkirk v The Owners – Strata Plan No 2661 (No 2) [2025] NSWCATCD 70 |
| D Robertson, Principal Member | Repairs and common property | Applicant successful The Miscellaneous Matters Application seeking an extension of time to comply with work orders for bathroom wall repairs and kitchen wall investigations was dismissed, with the respondent ordered to pay the applicant's costs. | — | 2025 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No. 89924 v Discovery Point Co-Operative Ltd [2025] NSWCATCD 95 |
| Senior Member D Goldstein | Management and meetings | Dismissed The application was dismissed because the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to hear disputes relating to the internal management and organization of a cooperative established under the Co-operatives National Law (NSW), as such matters do not fall within the categories specified in section 232 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015. | — | 2025 |
| Bartlett v The Owners – Strata Plan No 12375 [2025] NSWCATCD 92 |
| G K Burton SC, Senior Member | Levies and funds | Mixed The Tribunal determined that it has jurisdiction to hear the application and that consent order 2 from 2022 does not finalise all costs and expenses, with the $3,000 credit to be applied against amounts owing under section 104 of the SSMA; proceedings adjourned for further directions on remaining issues. | — | 2025 |
| Killer v Owners Corporation Plan No. 648341J [2025] VCAT 602 | Costs and procedure VCAT Owners Corporations; Costs On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| McClatchey v The Owners of Strata Plan No. 91138 [2025] NSWCATCD 91 |
| M Tyson, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Applicant successful The respondent owners corporation is ordered to pay the applicant's costs incurred from 25 September 2024 to 20 December 2024 on the ordinary basis, with each party bearing their own costs for the remaining period. | — | 2025 |
| Smile Australia Pty Ltd t/as The Trustee for the Smile Australia Superannuation Fund v The Owners – Strata Plan 21421 [2025] NSWCATCD 94 | Levies and contributions NSWCATCD LAND LAW — Strata title — Owners corporation — Contributions by owners — insurance costs — unreasonable refusal of consent STRATA SCHEMES — owners corporation — contributions — increased insurance premiums — levy on individual lot owner attributable to particular use of lot — whether refusal to consent to pay increased premium was unreasonable On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| The Owners - Strata Plan No. 550 v Artuphel [2025] NSWCATCD 82 |
| Dr D Goldman, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Applicant successful The Tribunal ordered the respondent to remove unauthorised bathroom works and reinstate the bathroom to its previous condition within 12 months, with permission for the Owners Corporation to enter and complete the work if the respondent fails to comply. | — | 2025 |
| Barnett v The Owners – Strata Plan No 85385; The Owners – Strata Plan No 85385 v Barnett [2025] NSWCATCD 81 |
| Senior Member N Kulkarni | Repairs and common property | Applicant successful The tribunal found that timber decks on balconies and terraces are common property, ordered the owners corporation to carry out replacement work within six months, declared special by-law 11 invalid, and ordered the owners corporation to pay the lot owners' costs. | — | 2025 |
| Owners Corporation 1 PS723350Q v Owners Corporation 2 PS723350Q [2025] VCAT 592 | Other VCAT Owners Corporations On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| Water World Pure Drinking Water Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 69536 [2025] NSWCATCD 83 |
| Senior Member R. Alkadamani | Water ingress | Applicant successful The owners corporation was found to have breached its statutory duty to maintain and repair common property, and ordered to pay the lot owner $81,669.52 in damages for foreseeable losses caused by water penetration events in February 2023 and February 2024. | $81,670 | 2025 |
| Evans v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 40841 [2025] NSWCATAP 159 |
| K Ransome, Principal Member; L Andelman, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Mixed The Appeal Panel dismissed the substantive appeal on the merits and on the appeal costs issue ordered that each party bear its own costs, finding no special circumstances warranted a departure from the general rule. | — | 2025 |
| Aqualand North Sydney Lavender Development Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 102081 [2025] NSWCA 143 |
| Mitchelmore JA; Ball JA; Free JA | Building defects | Respondent successful The Court of Appeal dismissed the developer's application for leave to appeal the freezing orders made by the primary judge, upholding the orders that restrained the developer from disposing of assets below $10,628,123.00. | $10,628,123 | 2025 |
| SAJE and THE OWNERS OF 36B THIRD AVENUE, MT LAWLEY STRATA PLAN 21602 [2025] WASAT 61 SP 21602 catalogued matter | Other WASAT Interim application - Whether a proceeding is wholly or in part lacking in substance or is an abuse of process - Turns on own facts On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| The Owners - Strata Plan No 55468 v Silberstein (No 2) [2025] NSWCATAP 156 |
| G Blake AM SC, Principal Member; M Tyson, Senior Member | Costs and procedure | Respondent successful The application by Jessica Silberstein to vary the costs order made on 8 May 2025 was dismissed, and she was ordered to pay The Owners - Strata Plan No 55468's costs of the application. | — | 2025 |
| Max Build Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 54026 (No 2) [2025] NSWSC 680 |
| Rees J | Costs and procedure | Applicant successful The court ruled that the defect inspection reports are admissible as business records under s 69 of the Evidence Act, with certain portions limited to use only as evidence that statements were made, not as to their truth, and ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion. | — | 2025 |
| Huo v The Owners – Strata Plan 44652 [2025] NSWCATAP 151 | Costs and procedure NSWCATAP COSTS – party/party – special circumstances – whether party has refused or failed to comply with the duty imposed by s 36(3) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – proceedings dismissed – no basis for indemnity costs On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| Adhami v The Owners – Strata Plan no 85271 [2025] NSWCATAP 145 |
| S Westgarth, Deputy President; P H Molony, Senior Member | Water ingress | Applicant successful The appeal was upheld and the matter was remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division for hearing on its merits, as the tribunal erred in applying the two-year time limit to claims for work orders rather than just compensation claims. | — | 2025 |
| THE OWNERS-UNIT PLAN 14971 V TERRITORY PLANNING AUTHORITY (Administrative Review) [2025] ACAT 43 UP 14971 catalogued matter | By-laws ACAT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – Controlled activity order under S424 Planning Act 2023 – failing comply with Crown lease – undertaking development without approval – units plan – direction to Owners Corporation to provide unrestricted public access to basement car parks of mixed use building complex Development approval under S197 of Planning and Development Act 2007 amending development approval under S162 – approved drawing showing parking spaces designated as "Public" – no provision for mandatory visitor parking for residential use as required by Codes Construction of development approvals and consents – public character restricting consideration of other documents – proper approach to construction of approved drawing – whether parking spaces designated as “Public” accessible by members of the public other than visitors – non-compliance with Codes precludes approval under S119 (1) Planning and Development Act – parking spaces for visitors only – controlled activity order set aside List of Legislation: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 Planning and Development Act 2007 Planning Act 2023 Unit Titles Act 2001 Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 List of Cases: \_Allandale Blue Metal v Roads and Maritime Service\_s [[2013] NSWCA 103](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2013/103.html "View Case") Bowler v Hilda P/L (in liq) [[2001] FCA 342](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2001/342.html "View Case") Haridemos and ACTPLA [[2012] ACAT 74](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/act/ACAT/2012/74.html "View Case") Hecar Investments No 6 P/L v Lake Macquarie MC (1984) 53 LGRA 322 Hunter Industrial Rental Equipment P/L v Dungog SC [[2019] NSWCA 147](/cgi-bin/LawCite cit=%5b2019%5d%20NSWCA%20147 "View LawCiteRecord") Modog v North Sydney City Council NSWLEC 1160 Pselletes v Randwick CC [[2009] NSWCA 262](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2009/262.html "View Case") Springrange P/L v ACTPA [[2010] ACTCA 17](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/act/ACTCA/2010/17.html "View Case") Warehouse Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v Woolworths Ltd [[2003] NSWCA 270](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2003/270.html "View Case") Westfield Management Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [[2006] NSWCA 425](/cgi-bin/LawCite cit=%5b2006%5d%20NSWCA%20425 "View LawCiteRecord") List of Text /Papers: Herzfeld and Prince, Interpretation (Lawbook, 3rd ed, 2024) On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| The Proprietors Units Plan 97014 v KS & RRR Pty Ltd [2025] NTCAT 9 UP 97014 catalogued matter | Other NTCAT On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| Avirame v The Owners-Strata Plan No 863852 [2025] NSWCATAP 142 SP 863852 structured decision |
| D Charles, Senior Member; N Kennedy, Senior Member | Costs and procedure | Applicant successful The appeal was allowed and the costs order requiring the appellant to pay the respondent's costs was set aside, with each party ordered to bear their own costs of the interim orders application. | — | 2025 |
| LENANE and THE OWNERS OF HARBOUR PINES STRATA PLAN 23297 [2025] WASAT 53 SP 23297 catalogued matter | Repairs and common property WASAT Strata titles - Maintenance (10 year) plan - Compared with budget - Whether approved maintenance plan a budget - Whether requirements for notices of meeting met - Discretion - Voting - Applicants' exclusion as unfinancial - Oppressive and unreasonable conduct On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| DALTON v THE OWNERS - UNITS PLAN No 7220 (Unit Titles) [2025] ACAT 39 UP 7220 catalogued matter | Repairs and common property ACAT UNIT TILTES – merits review of a failed motion at a general meeting of the owners corporation – where motion sought retrospective approval for alterations made to the deck and balcony railing of a townhouse without prior approval of the owners corporation in breach of default rule 1.4 – where breach of the rule was inadvertent, rather than deliberate – where alterations enhanced the appearance, liveability and value of the unit without detracting in any material respect from the visual appeal of the complex or having any adverse effect on the value of other properties in the complex – where the Tribunal was satisfied that the correct or preferable decision was to give effect to the motion and that opposition to the motion was unreasonable – order made giving effect to the motion Legislation cited: Legislation Act 2001, s 132(1) Unit Titles Legislation Amendment Act 2020 (repealed), s 146 Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011, ss 106, 108(1) 129(1)(g), sched. 3 (s 3.16) Subordinate Legislation cited: Unit Titles (Management) Regulation 2011, sched. 1 On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| Roche v Owners Corporation 1 PS747688Q [2025] VCAT 518 | Other VCAT Building and Property On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| The Owners – Strata Plan 934 v T&P Chimes Development Pty Ltd (No 3) [2025] NSWLEC 58 | Other NSWLEC LAND LAW – strata title – notice of motion – Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 (NSW) – ancillary orders – appointment of a trustee for the sale of an owner’s lot On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2025 | |||
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 93543 v Zhang (No 3) [2025] NSWSC 571 |
| Stevenson J | Building defects | Applicant successful The Owners Corporation successfully rescinded the Deed of Settlement, established that proceedings were commenced within the warranty period under the Home Building Act 1989, and is entitled to damages for defective works within the common property, with questions of extent of defects and rectification costs to be determined by a referee. | — | 2025 |
Structured rows are read from the decision's own text into fields; fields the decision does not state are left blank, never inferred. Catalogued rows are matters we hold from the tribunal register, ahead of that read. Every row links to the source decision.