Strata scheme SP 1813
SP 1813 New South Wales
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
The Owners – Strata Plan No. 1813 v Keevers [2022] NSWCATCD 104
Levies and contributions NSWCATCD 6 July 2022
LAND LAW – Strata schemes – Recovery of unpaid contributions and interest
The Owners - Strata Plan No 1813 v Keevers, Bourke & Fardell (No 2) [2021] NSWCATAP 229
Levies and contributions NSWCATAP 30 July 2021
APPEALS-orders consequential upon substantive decision-remittal of claims for redetermination-costs COSTS - -costs of the appeal follow the event-substantial success by the appellant LAND LAW - Strata title –orders consequential upon substantive decision-set aside appointment of compulsory strata manager-set aside orders varying amount of the levy
The Owners - Strata Plan No 1813 v Keevers [2021] NSWCATAP 130
Levies and contributions NSWCATAP 12 May 2021
LAND LAW - Strata title - special levy - resolution for large amount in respect of common property works - whether special levy went beyond what required to carry out repair work required pursuant to s 106 of the Strata Schemes Management Act (SSMA) - whether resolution to impose special levy made for an improper purpose - controlling lot owners’ objective to buy out other lots in order to redevelop - appointment of strata manager under s 237 of the SSMA - whether improper purpose an irrelevant
Decisions naming this scheme, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | NSW Strata Hub | Stub only | Awaiting first run |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Checked, none found | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.