43-45 North Steyne Manly
SP 69470 · Registered 28 February 2003 · 11 lots · Northern Beaches · New South Wales checked 10 June 2026
Public record: 7 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.
- 7 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about levies and contributions
- $6,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
7 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
-
No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub
We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.
Cost exposure
Moderate exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Tribunal and legal costs 7 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 7 matters. | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
| Total per lot | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
Across all 11 lots, an expected program of this kind is on the order of $69,300 building-wide, before any government contribution.
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What was the levy or contributions dispute about, and are any unfunded works coming?
Because we found a levy/contributions matter on record.
- 2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 7 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan SP 69470 was registered on 28 February 2003 in the Northern Beaches council area and comprises 11 lots.
It is located at 43-45 North Steyne Manly.
Parcel geometry for the scheme is held on file.
Litigation
- Owners Corporation Strata Plan 69470 v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 69948 (No 2) [2017] NSWDC 262
Costs and procedure NSWDC 18 September 2017
CONTRACT – STRATA SCHEMES – strata management statement – construction of clauses within statement – whether failure to pay in accordance with statement gives rise to cause of action – BREACH – whether statement breached by failure to pay in accordance with “payment notice” – whether auditor validly appointed WORDS AND PHRASES – meaning of “duly audited” – “reasonable details” – purpose of having “duly audited payment notice” JURISDICTION – whether District Court of NSW has jurisdiction to deter
- Owners Corporation SP 69470 v Owners Corporation SP 69948 [2017] NSWSC 617
Costs and procedure NSWSC 19 May 2017
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – proceedings transferred to Supreme Court pursuant to s 144(2) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – where District Court had a doubt as to its jurisdiction to grant certain equitable relief – whether to remit matter to District Court
- Owners Corporation Strata Plan 69470 v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 69948 (No 1) [2017] NSWDC 181
Levies and contributions NSWDC 13 April 2017
DISTRICT COURT – jurisdiction in equity proceedings – whether District Court empowered to determine equitable claim or demand for recovery of money or damages – whether District Court must transfer proceedings to the Supreme Court – pending Court of Appeal decision
- Owners Corporation SP 69470 v Sydney Water Corporation [2015] NSWCATAP 177
Other NSWCATAP 19 August 2015
Consumer Claim – Negligence alleged – no duty of care
- Owners Corporation SP 69470 v Sydney Water Corporation [2014] NSWCATCD 221
Other NSWCATCD 28 November 2014
Consumer claim, cause of action, limitation period
- Owners Corporation Strata Plan 69470 & Ors v CGMB Company Pty Ltd & Ors [2007] NSWSC 634
Other NSWSC 22 June 2007
PROPERTY - Strata plans - Strata Management Statement provided that "owners" of commercial lots in strata building must not use lots as fast food outlets - Lot used by lessee as fast food outlet - Proper construction of Statement - Whether owner permitted lessee to use lot in breach of Statement - Whether owner should be ordered to require lessee to stop using lot as a fast food outlet - LANDLORD AND TENANT - Construction of lease - Whether lessee's use of lot as a fast food outlet in breach of
- Charbel CJ Pty Limited & Anor v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 69470 [2005] NSWCA 241
Other NSWCA 10 August 2005
PROPERTY- Strata plans - Strata Management Statement provided that "owners" of commercial lots in strata building must not use lots as fast food outlets - Lots used by lessees as fast food outlets - Proper construction of Statement - Whether obligation in Statement imposed upon lessees or proprietors only - Whether lessees in breach of covenant contained in s 28W(2)(b) of Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 - PROCEDURE - Whether leave should be granted to raise point not taken in cour
Companies named in these matters
Builders, developers, and contractors named opposite this scheme. A company appearing across many schemes is a pattern worth a closer look before you buy.
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Compared to Manly
In Manly, 2% of 654 strata schemes carry a tribunal matter on the public record. This scheme's 7 matters are well above the local average of 1.6 per litigated scheme.
The Manly dispute landscape →Evidence ledger
Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | NSW Strata Hub, with geometry | Direct | Awaiting first run |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 7 matters | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Checked, none found | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.