Strata scheme CTS 10749

CTS 10749 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026

Public record: 9 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

9 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about repairs and common property
$31,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.

9 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
Water-ingress dispute on record

At least one matter touches water, ingress, or waterproofing, the single most common driver of strata special levies. Confirm whether it has been fully rectified.
Building-defect dispute on record

A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.

Cost exposure

Elevated exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $8,700 per lot

Expected $31,300 per lot

Worst case $104,900 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Serious building-defect rectification A building-defect dispute appears in this scheme's record. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.	$8,000	$25,000	$80,000
Tribunal and legal costs 9 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 9 matters.	$700	$6,300	$24,900
Total per lot	$8,700	$31,300	$104,900

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
Has the water-ingress issue that went to the tribunal been fully rectified, and who paid for it?

Because we found a water/waterproofing dispute on record.
2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 9 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan CTS 10749 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

The Dorchester [2026] QBCCMCmr 121
Building defects QBCCMCmr 24 April 2026

MAINTENANCE – rainwater ingress - where rooftop waterproofing membrane requires replacement – whether structures constructed in rooftop exclusive use area need to be removed to facilitate membrane replacement. Where there are maintenance and safety concerns with structures built on rooftop exclusive use area. Act, ss 94, 163, 243, 276, 279; Accommodation Module, ss 80, 106
The Dorchester [2024] QBCCMCmr 406
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 11 November 2024

MAINTENANCE – where there are maintenance and safety concerns with structures built on an exclusive use rooftop area – whether the body corporate can permanently remove the structures – whether orders are warranted relating to removal works. Act, ss 11, 94, 163, 243A; Standard Module, ss 180, 187, 192, 193
The Dorchester [2024] QBCCMCmr 407
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 11 November 2024

GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – where the applicant disputes 7 general meeting motions relating to an ongoing dispute about structures on the applicant’s exclusive use area of common property – whether the motions are valid. Act, ss 11, 94; Standard Module, ss 91, 116, 172-4, 184, 186, 193, 212
The Dorchester [2024] QBCCMCmr 396
Other QBCCMCmr 31 October 2024

INTERIM ORDER – whether interim orders are warranted. Act, s 279
The Dorchester [2024] QBCCMCmr 337
Other QBCCMCmr 17 September 2024

INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order should be extended. Act, s 279
The Dorchester [2023] QBCCMCmr 367
Other QBCCMCmr 18 September 2023

INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
The Dorchester [2023] QBCCMCmr 220
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 9 June 2023

AGM RESOLUTION; IMPROVEMENT TO EXCLUSIVE USE AREA – where the body corporate passed a motion to rescind an earlier approval for an improvement to an exclusive use area with a view to having the improvement removed to facilitate maintenance and ongoing monitoring of common property beneath it; whether the motion should be declared void because the body corporate misled owners; whether the body corporate acted unreasonably by denying the applicant sufficient opportunity to obtain his own expert report before voting on the motion, or by deciding to revoke approval when the applicant was willing to facilitate access to the common property beneath the improvement for the purpose of the proposed maintenance. Act, ss 20, 94, 163; Standard Module, ss 116, 193.
The Dorchester [2022] QBCCMCmr 252
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 5 July 2022

APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented pending final orders from implementing a general meeting resolution that rescinded prior approval for an improvement to an exclusive use area; whether the resolution authorised the body corporate to remove the improvement. Act, ss 163, 279(1); Standard Module, s 116.
The Dorchester [2021] QBCCMCmr 549
Building defects QBCCMCmr 1 December 2021

MAINTENANCE OF EXCLUSIVE USE AREA – whether an owner must remove improvements within his exclusive use area so the body corporate can install a new waterproof membrane and investigate/repair utility infrastructure that was implicated in water ingress to multiple lots; whether the owner must pay for repairs to the slab and utility infrastructure, where he may be responsible for damaging them. Act, ss 163, 166, 167, 177(1), 281; Standard Module, ss 166, 192(3).

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	Land registry	Stub only	Not harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	9 matters	Direct	Not harvested here yet
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Outside current coverage	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.