Strata scheme CTS 10749
CTS 10749 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 9 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $6,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 9 matters.
Litigation · 9 matters
The Dorchester [2026] QBCCMCmr 121
Building defects QBCCMCmr 24 April 2026
MAINTENANCE – rainwater ingress - where rooftop waterproofing membrane requires replacement – whether structures constructed in rooftop exclusive use area need to be removed to facilitate membrane replacement. Where there are maintenance and safety concerns with structures built on rooftop exclusive use area. Act, ss 94, 163, 243, 276, 279; Accommodation Module, ss 80, 106
The Dorchester [2024] QBCCMCmr 406
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 11 November 2024
MAINTENANCE – where there are maintenance and safety concerns with structures built on an exclusive use rooftop area – whether the body corporate can permanently remove the structures – whether orders are warranted relating to removal works. Act, ss 11, 94, 163, 243A; Standard Module, ss 180, 187, 192, 193
The Dorchester [2024] QBCCMCmr 407
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 11 November 2024
GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – where the applicant disputes 7 general meeting motions relating to an ongoing dispute about structures on the applicant’s exclusive use area of common property – whether the motions are valid. Act, ss 11, 94; Standard Module, ss 91, 116, 172-4, 184, 186, 193, 212
The Dorchester [2024] QBCCMCmr 396
Other QBCCMCmr 31 October 2024
INTERIM ORDER – whether interim orders are warranted. Act, s 279
The Dorchester [2024] QBCCMCmr 337
Other QBCCMCmr 17 September 2024
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order should be extended. Act, s 279
The Dorchester [2023] QBCCMCmr 367
Other QBCCMCmr 18 September 2023
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
The Dorchester [2023] QBCCMCmr 220
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 9 June 2023
AGM RESOLUTION; IMPROVEMENT TO EXCLUSIVE USE AREA – where the body corporate passed a motion to rescind an earlier approval for an improvement to an exclusive use area with a view to having the improvement removed to facilitate maintenance and ongoing monitoring of common property beneath it; whether the motion should be declared void because the body corporate misled owners; whether the body corporate acted unreasonably by denying the applicant sufficient opportunity to obtain his own expert report before voting on the motion, or by deciding to revoke approval when the applicant was willing to facilitate access to the common property beneath the improvement for the purpose of the proposed maintenance. Act, ss 20, 94, 163; Standard Module, ss 116, 193.
The Dorchester [2022] QBCCMCmr 252
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 5 July 2022
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented pending final orders from implementing a general meeting resolution that rescinded prior approval for an improvement to an exclusive use area; whether the resolution authorised the body corporate to remove the improvement. Act, ss 163, 279(1); Standard Module, s 116.
The Dorchester [2021] QBCCMCmr 549
Building defects QBCCMCmr 1 December 2021
MAINTENANCE OF EXCLUSIVE USE AREA – whether an owner must remove improvements within his exclusive use area so the body corporate can install a new waterproof membrane and investigate/repair utility infrastructure that was implicated in water ingress to multiple lots; whether the owner must pay for repairs to the slab and utility infrastructure, where he may be responsible for damaging them. Act, ss 163, 166, 167, 177(1), 281; Standard Module, ss 166, 192(3).
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 9 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.