Strata scheme CTS 25277

CTS 25277 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026

Public record: 15 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.

  1. Public record checked

    Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.

  2. Read the strata report →

    Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.

  3. Questions to ask

    The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.

  4. Decide

    Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.

  • 15 litigation matters on record

    Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.

  • Water-ingress dispute on record

    At least one matter touches water, ingress, or waterproofing, the single most common driver of strata special levies. Confirm whether it has been fully rectified.

Cost exposure

Moderate exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $2,700 per lot
Expected $14,300 per lot
Worst case $49,900 per lot

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
DriverGoodExpectedWorst

Waterproofing and common-property repair

A water or waterproofing dispute appears in this scheme's record.

Indicative per-lot waterproofing and common-property repair levies (strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.

$2,000$8,000$25,000

Tribunal and legal costs

15 tribunal or court matters on the public record.

Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 15 matters.

$700$6,300$24,900
Total per lot$2,700$14,300$49,900

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

  • 1

    Has the water-ingress issue that went to the tribunal been fully rectified, and who paid for it?

    Because we found a water/waterproofing dispute on record.

  • 2

    What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?

    Because we found a by-law matter on record.

  • 3

    What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?

  • 4

    Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?

  • 5

    Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 15 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan CTS 25277 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2023] QBCCMCmr 355

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 11 September 2023

    COMMITTEE RESOLUTIONS - Validity of, where it is alleged a conflict of interest existed, but was not declared; where those resolutions have been rescinded in general meeting Act, s 279; Commercial Module, ss 30, 35

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2023] QBCCMCmr 327

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 24 August 2023

    GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – whether resolutions purportedly passed at a general meeting were valid – whether the motions should have been ruled out of order. Act, ss 62, 94, 100; Commercial Module, ss 30, 56

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2023] QBCCMCmr 66

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 20 February 2023

    COMMITTEE DECISION – ENCROACHMENT – REASONABLENESS – ACQUIESCENCE – RESTRICTED ISSUE – where lot owner encroached onto common property by enclosing part of common property to incorporate it into use of lot – where proceedings commenced in Supreme Court to regularise encroachment under Property Law Act – where proceedings in BCCM separately commenced challenging validity of committee elections – where committee resolved to remove encroachment wall – whether reasonable to resolve to remove encroachment where Supreme Court proceedings and validity of committee unresolved – whether committee decision was a demand for possession bringing the licence to an end – whether committee decision to bring licence to an end was a restricted issue. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5); Commercial Module, s 17

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2023] QBCCMCmr 21

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 23 January 2023

    Validity of committee resolutions where it is alleged a conflict of interest existed, but was not declared; whether interim order should be granted Act, s 279; Commercial Module, ss 30, 35

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2022] QBCCMCmr 398

    Other QBCCMCmr 8 November 2022

    INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2022] QBCCMCmr 338

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 9 September 2022

    COMMIITTEE – ELECTION – where committee election nominations by corporate owners were accepted for the AGM papers – where the AGM chair declared the nominations were invalid including for non-compliance with section 127 of the Corporations Act 2001 – where votes for those candidates were not counted – where results of committee elections were potentially affected – whether the nominations were valid – whether nominations by corporate owners must comply with section 127 of the Corporations Act 2001 DECLARATIONS – whether requested declarations are appropriate to make Act, s 276; Commercial Module, s 11

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2022] QBCCMCmr 302

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 15 August 2022

    INTERIM ORDER – where interim order sought to restrain committee acting on resolutions to remove lot’s encroachment onto common property – where applicant lot owner has instituted proceedings in the Supreme Court to regularise the encroachment – whether committee decisions to demand possession were unreasonable or were on a restricted issue – whether adjudication is the appropriate jurisdiction to make an interim order substantively about a dispute before a Court. Act, s 279; Commercial Module, s 17

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2022] QBCCMCmr 240

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 28 June 2022

    IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY; BY-LAWS – whether a lot owner installed telecommunications equipment upon common property without body corporate approval; whether the installation was contrary to the regulation or by-laws; whether the owner should seek body corporate approval for the installation or remove it. Act, s 94(1)(a); Commercial Module, ss 133-134; Land Title Act 1994, s 115O(1).

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2022] QBCCMCmr 230

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 17 June 2022

    ONUS OF PROOF – STANDARD OF PROOF – EVIDENCE –connection of plumbing from within Lot 3 to the sewer line on the common property – whether wastewater pipe was previously connected to sewer line – where no direct evidence of fault or omission by the body corporate – whether evidence sufficient to satisfy adjudicator of body corporate liability\_‑\_ – meaning of balance of probabilities

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2021] QBCCMCmr 533

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 24 November 2021

    Resolution to grant licence over area of common property made by administrator exercising powers of body corporate – whether valid. Act, s 94

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2020] QBCCMCmr 299

    Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 3 June 2020

    COMMITTEE – whether the body corporate had decided the way to conduct the election of the committee; whether there is good reason to consider invalidating the election of the committee. ADMINISTRATOR – whether an order is required to appoint an administrator. COSTS – whether to dismiss the application under section 270(1)(c) of the Act and award costs against the applicants. Act, ss 99, 242, 270; Commercial Module, ss 10, 14.

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2020] QBCCMCmr 300

    Other QBCCMCmr 3 June 2020

    COMMITTEE – whether the committee had power to make a body corporate decision; whether the committee acted reasonably making a body corporate decision. Act, ss 94, 100, 101, 108-110; Commercial Module, ss 18, 26

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2020] QBCCMCmr 301

    Other QBCCMCmr 3 June 2020

    ADMINISTRATOR – whether it is just and equitable in the circumstances to appoint an administrator. Act, ss 276, 301.

  • 211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2020] QBCCMCmr 134

    Other QBCCMCmr 17 March 2020

    EGM REQUISITIONED BY LOT OWNERS – WHETHER EGM CALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 43 COMMERCIAL MODULE -WHETHER COMMITTEE DECISIONS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 28 COMMERCIAL MODULE Section 276 Act Sections 28, 35, 39, 43 Commercial Module

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelLand registryStub onlyNot harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts15 mattersDirectNot harvested here yet
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersOutside current coverageNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public record, and no registry entry for this schemeNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.