Strata scheme CTS 25277
CTS 25277 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 15 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $8,000
Waterproofing and common-property repair
Indicative per-lot waterproofing and common-property repair levies (strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $6,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 15 matters.
Litigation · 15 matters
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2023] QBCCMCmr 355
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 11 September 2023
COMMITTEE RESOLUTIONS - Validity of, where it is alleged a conflict of interest existed, but was not declared; where those resolutions have been rescinded in general meeting Act, s 279; Commercial Module, ss 30, 35
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2023] QBCCMCmr 327
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 24 August 2023
GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – whether resolutions purportedly passed at a general meeting were valid – whether the motions should have been ruled out of order. Act, ss 62, 94, 100; Commercial Module, ss 30, 56
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2023] QBCCMCmr 66
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 20 February 2023
COMMITTEE DECISION – ENCROACHMENT – REASONABLENESS – ACQUIESCENCE – RESTRICTED ISSUE – where lot owner encroached onto common property by enclosing part of common property to incorporate it into use of lot – where proceedings commenced in Supreme Court to regularise encroachment under Property Law Act – where proceedings in BCCM separately commenced challenging validity of committee elections – where committee resolved to remove encroachment wall – whether reasonable to resolve to remove encroachment where Supreme Court proceedings and validity of committee unresolved – whether committee decision was a demand for possession bringing the licence to an end – whether committee decision to bring licence to an end was a restricted issue. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5); Commercial Module, s 17
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2023] QBCCMCmr 21
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 23 January 2023
Validity of committee resolutions where it is alleged a conflict of interest existed, but was not declared; whether interim order should be granted Act, s 279; Commercial Module, ss 30, 35
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2022] QBCCMCmr 398
Other QBCCMCmr 8 November 2022
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2022] QBCCMCmr 338
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 9 September 2022
COMMIITTEE – ELECTION – where committee election nominations by corporate owners were accepted for the AGM papers – where the AGM chair declared the nominations were invalid including for non-compliance with section 127 of the Corporations Act 2001 – where votes for those candidates were not counted – where results of committee elections were potentially affected – whether the nominations were valid – whether nominations by corporate owners must comply with section 127 of the Corporations Act 2001 DECLARATIONS – whether requested declarations are appropriate to make Act, s 276; Commercial Module, s 11
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2022] QBCCMCmr 302
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 15 August 2022
INTERIM ORDER – where interim order sought to restrain committee acting on resolutions to remove lot’s encroachment onto common property – where applicant lot owner has instituted proceedings in the Supreme Court to regularise the encroachment – whether committee decisions to demand possession were unreasonable or were on a restricted issue – whether adjudication is the appropriate jurisdiction to make an interim order substantively about a dispute before a Court. Act, s 279; Commercial Module, s 17
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2022] QBCCMCmr 240
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 28 June 2022
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY; BY-LAWS – whether a lot owner installed telecommunications equipment upon common property without body corporate approval; whether the installation was contrary to the regulation or by-laws; whether the owner should seek body corporate approval for the installation or remove it. Act, s 94(1)(a); Commercial Module, ss 133-134; Land Title Act 1994, s 115O(1).
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2022] QBCCMCmr 230
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 17 June 2022
ONUS OF PROOF – STANDARD OF PROOF – EVIDENCE –connection of plumbing from within Lot 3 to the sewer line on the common property – whether wastewater pipe was previously connected to sewer line – where no direct evidence of fault or omission by the body corporate – whether evidence sufficient to satisfy adjudicator of body corporate liability\_‑\_ – meaning of balance of probabilities
211 Ron Penhalligon Way Offices [2021] QBCCMCmr 599
Other QBCCMCmr 22 December 2021
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2021] QBCCMCmr 533
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 24 November 2021
Resolution to grant licence over area of common property made by administrator exercising powers of body corporate – whether valid. Act, s 94
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2020] QBCCMCmr 299
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 3 June 2020
COMMITTEE – whether the body corporate had decided the way to conduct the election of the committee; whether there is good reason to consider invalidating the election of the committee. ADMINISTRATOR – whether an order is required to appoint an administrator. COSTS – whether to dismiss the application under section 270(1)(c) of the Act and award costs against the applicants. Act, ss 99, 242, 270; Commercial Module, ss 10, 14.
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2020] QBCCMCmr 300
Other QBCCMCmr 3 June 2020
COMMITTEE – whether the committee had power to make a body corporate decision; whether the committee acted reasonably making a body corporate decision. Act, ss 94, 100, 101, 108-110; Commercial Module, ss 18, 26
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2020] QBCCMCmr 301
Other QBCCMCmr 3 June 2020
ADMINISTRATOR – whether it is just and equitable in the circumstances to appoint an administrator. Act, ss 276, 301.
211 Ron Penhaligon Way Offices [2020] QBCCMCmr 134
Other QBCCMCmr 17 March 2020
EGM REQUISITIONED BY LOT OWNERS – WHETHER EGM CALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 43 COMMERCIAL MODULE -WHETHER COMMITTEE DECISIONS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 28 COMMERCIAL MODULE Section 276 Act Sections 28, 35, 39, 43 Commercial Module
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 15 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.