Strata scheme CTS 32107
CTS 32107 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
- 2 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about management and meetings
- $3,700 indicative cost exposure per lot, low band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
2 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
Cost exposure
Low exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Tribunal and legal costs 2 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters. | $500 | $3,700 | $13,000 |
| Total per lot | $500 | $3,700 | $13,000 |
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 2
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 3
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 2 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan CTS 32107 is on the register.
Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.
Litigation
- Millbrook Villas [2024] QBCCMCmr 109
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 21 March 2024
GENERAL MEETING MOTION – where a motion proposed to amend a clause of a caretaking and letting agreement – where the legislation therefore required voters to be provided with material including the terms and effect of the amendment – whether that requirement was satisfied – where the explanatory note allegedly did not put a balanced view for and against the proposed amendment – where a caretaking service contractor is obliged under the Code of Conduct to act in the body corporate’s best interests – whether the caretaking service contractor was therefore obliged to put a balanced view in the explanatory note – where the explanatory note allegedly misrepresented a legal proposition concerning the amendment – whether the legal proposition was an expression of opinion – whether an expression of opinion can be misleading conduct if the opinion is incorrect – whether the explanatory note was misleading to the extent the decision to pass the motion was unreasonable SECRET VOTING – where a motion was required to be decided by secret ballot – where voters were instructed to vote in hard copy and electronically – where the body corporate had not authorised electronic voting for secret ballots – where the electronic votes were ruled out of order and not counted – where the motion was declared passed based on the hard copy votes – whether the electronic voting process affected the outcome – whether the resolution should be invalidated because the electronic voting process was unauthorised Act, ss 118, Sched 2 item 4 Accommodation Module, ss 99(1), 125(2)
- Millbrook Villas [2023] QBCCMCmr 225
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 12 June 2023
INTERIM ORDERS – CONSENT – where applicant disputes the validity of resolutions passed at AGM – where interim order sought to restrain implementation – where new committee consents to interim order – whether to make interim order. Act, s 279
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.