Strata scheme CTS 32107
CTS 32107 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Millbrook Villas [2024] QBCCMCmr 109
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 21 March 2024
GENERAL MEETING MOTION – where a motion proposed to amend a clause of a caretaking and letting agreement – where the legislation therefore required voters to be provided with material including the terms and effect of the amendment – whether that requirement was satisfied – where the explanatory note allegedly did not put a balanced view for and against the proposed amendment – where a caretaking service contractor is obliged under the Code of Conduct to act in the body corporate’s best interests – whether the caretaking service contractor was therefore obliged to put a balanced view in the explanatory note – where the explanatory note allegedly misrepresented a legal proposition concerning the amendment – whether the legal proposition was an expression of opinion – whether an expression of opinion can be misleading conduct if the opinion is incorrect – whether the explanatory note was misleading to the extent the decision to pass the motion was unreasonable SECRET VOTING – where a motion was required to be decided by secret ballot – where voters were instructed to vote in hard copy and electronically – where the body corporate had not authorised electronic voting for secret ballots – where the electronic votes were ruled out of order and not counted – where the motion was declared passed based on the hard copy votes – whether the electronic voting process affected the outcome – whether the resolution should be invalidated because the electronic voting process was unauthorised Act, ss 118, Sched 2 item 4 Accommodation Module, ss 99(1), 125(2)
Millbrook Villas [2023] QBCCMCmr 225
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 12 June 2023
INTERIM ORDERS – CONSENT – where applicant disputes the validity of resolutions passed at AGM – where interim order sought to restrain implementation – where new committee consents to interim order – whether to make interim order. Act, s 279
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.