Strata scheme CTS 32681
CTS 32681 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026
Public record: 6 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
- 6 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about management and meetings
- $6,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
6 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
Cost exposure
Moderate exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Tribunal and legal costs 6 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 6 matters. | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
| Total per lot | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What was the levy or contributions dispute about, and are any unfunded works coming?
Because we found a levy/contributions matter on record.
- 2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 6 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan CTS 32681 is on the register.
Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.
Litigation
- Village Life Wynnum 2 [2025] QBCCMCmr 56
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 18 February 2025
COMMITTEE SPENDING – where purported spending by the committee exceeded the relevant limit for major spending- circumstances where spending beyond relevant limit for committee spending can be subsequently ratified by a general meeting Accommodation Module ss 125, 127, 163.
- Village Life Wynnum 2 [2024] QBCCMCmr 440
Other QBCCMCmr 2 December 2024
INTERIM ORDER – Application for interim order–whether Adjudicator can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and that the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act s 279, Accommodation Module ss 125, 127, 163.
- Village Life Wynnum 2 [2024] QBCCMCmr 391
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 25 October 2024
COMMITTEE SPENDING – where purported spending by the committee exceeded the relevant limit for major spending- circumstances where spending beyond relevant limit for committee spending can be subsequently ratified by a general meeting INTERIM ORDER – Application for interim order–whether Adjudicator can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and that the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act s 279, Accommodation Module ss 125, 127, 163.
- Village Life Wynnum 2 [2022] QBCCMCmr 428
Other QBCCMCmr 23 November 2022
Access to body corporate records by owner. Act, ss 94, 205; Accommodation Module, ss 213, 220, 221
- Village Life Wynnum 2 [2021] QBCCMCmr 283
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 9 June 2021
COMMITTEE SPENDING – where purported spending by the committee exceeded the relevant limit for major spending- circumstances where spending beyond relevant limit for committee spending can be subsequently ratified by a general meeting.
- Village Life Wynnum 2 [2020] QBCCMCmr 85
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 21 February 2020
GENERAL MEETING RESOLUTIONS – whether motions to adopt administrative and sinking fund budgets may be passed or rescinded at an extraordinary general meeting; whether the body corporate could validly ratify the engagement of gardeners without being notified that the gardeners had already completed the work and been paid for it; whether the body corporate could reasonably refuse to pass a motion to compel committee members to complete training on body corporate law and practice. Act, ss 94, 95(1); Accommodation Module, ss 71(3), 93, 137-139.
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 6 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.