← Back to the full dossier
StrataAuditor Public-record dossier

Strata scheme CTS 32681

CTS 32681 Queensland

Verdict

Public record: 6 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

Cost exposure

Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Moderate
Good case $700 per lot
Expected $6,300 per lot
Worst case $24,900 per lot
  • Tribunal and legal costs

    Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 6 matters.

    $6,300

Litigation · 6 matters

  • Village Life Wynnum 2 [2025] QBCCMCmr 56

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 18 February 2025

    COMMITTEE SPENDING – where purported spending by the committee exceeded the relevant limit for major spending- circumstances where spending beyond relevant limit for committee spending can be subsequently ratified by a general meeting Accommodation Module ss 125, 127, 163.

  • Village Life Wynnum 2 [2024] QBCCMCmr 440

    Other QBCCMCmr 2 December 2024

    INTERIM ORDER – Application for interim order–whether Adjudicator can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and that the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act s 279, Accommodation Module ss 125, 127, 163.

  • Village Life Wynnum 2 [2024] QBCCMCmr 391

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 25 October 2024

    COMMITTEE SPENDING – where purported spending by the committee exceeded the relevant limit for major spending- circumstances where spending beyond relevant limit for committee spending can be subsequently ratified by a general meeting INTERIM ORDER – Application for interim order–whether Adjudicator can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and that the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act s 279, Accommodation Module ss 125, 127, 163.

  • Village Life Wynnum 2 [2022] QBCCMCmr 428

    Other QBCCMCmr 23 November 2022

    Access to body corporate records by owner. Act, ss 94, 205; Accommodation Module, ss 213, 220, 221

  • Village Life Wynnum 2 [2021] QBCCMCmr 283

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 9 June 2021

    COMMITTEE SPENDING – where purported spending by the committee exceeded the relevant limit for major spending- circumstances where spending beyond relevant limit for committee spending can be subsequently ratified by a general meeting.

  • Village Life Wynnum 2 [2020] QBCCMCmr 85

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 21 February 2020

    GENERAL MEETING RESOLUTIONS – whether motions to adopt administrative and sinking fund budgets may be passed or rescinded at an extraordinary general meeting; whether the body corporate could validly ratify the engagement of gardeners without being notified that the gardeners had already completed the work and been paid for it; whether the body corporate could reasonably refuse to pass a motion to compel committee members to complete training on body corporate law and practice. Act, ss 94, 95(1); Accommodation Module, ss 71(3), 93, 137-139.

Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelLand registryStub onlyNot harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts6 mattersDirectNot harvested here yet
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersOutside current coverageNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public record, and no registry entry for this schemeNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.

Compiled by StrataAuditor from Queensland titles register and the relevant licence registers. Litigation from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. Records only, as published; unknowns are shown as unknowns.

Coverage caveat: this reflects only what is on the public record for Queensland at the time of generation. An empty matters or orders count is not a clean bill: fund balances, current levies, minutes, and defects not yet litigated are never on the public record. Obtain the strata report before you bid.

Public-record summary, not legal or financial advice.

Generated 4 July 2026 · StrataAuditor

strataauditor.com/building/qld:CTS32681