Strata scheme CTS 34902
CTS 34902 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
- 4 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about by-laws
- $30,000 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
4 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
-
Building-defect dispute on record
A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.
Cost exposure
Elevated exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious building-defect rectification A building-defect dispute appears in this scheme's record. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter. | $8,000 | $25,000 | $80,000 |
Tribunal and legal costs 4 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters. | $600 | $5,000 | $18,900 |
| Total per lot | $8,600 | $30,000 | $98,900 |
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What building defects have been identified, is there a funded rectification plan, and does the builder's warranty still apply?
Because we found a building-defect dispute on record.
- 2
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?
Because we found a by-law matter on record.
- 3
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 4
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 5
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 4 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan CTS 34902 is on the register.
Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.
Litigation
- Artique [2026] QBCCMCmr 43
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 18 February 2026
GENERAL MEETING – whether notice of extraordinary general meeting complied with legislative requirements; GENERAL MEETING MOTION – whether motions proposed by committee provided owners with sufficient notice of what was proposed and the implications if the body corporate decided to pass the motions; EXPENDITURE – whether motions proposing expenditure above the relevant limit for major spending at the scheme complied with the legislative requirements. Act, s 94(2); Accommodation Module, ss 77, 81, 161, 163
- Artique [2023] QBCCMCmr 386
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 11 October 2023
TRANSFER FEE – where the applicant caretaking service contractor was transferred the caretaking and letting rights in 2007 – where the caretaking engagement and letting agent authorisation expired in 2021 but the applicant continued to provide the same services on a month-to-month basis until a new long-term contract was executed some five months later – where the applicant transferred the caretaking and letting rights to another contractor in 2022 – whether the applicant’s “initial contract date” was the date the rights were transferred to it in 2007 or the date the latest engagement and authorisation was executed in 2021 – whether the applicant was required to pay a transfer fee to the body corporate – whether the body corporate must reimburse the transfer fee – whether the body corporate must reimburse the applicant’s costs of making this application. Act, s 280(1); Accommodation Module, ss 133(1), 135-137.
- Artique [2021] QBCCMCmr 596
By-laws QBCCMCmr 21 December 2021
BY-LAWS – NUISANCE, HAZARD, UNREASONABLE INTERFERENCE – where the respondent smokes on her lot and balcony – where the applicant experiences smoke drift – whether the respondent is in breach of the by-laws - whether the respondent is causing a nuisance, a hazard, or an unreasonable interference. Act, ss 167, 182-186
- Artique [2020] QBCCMCmr 48
Other QBCCMCmr 3 February 2020
Application for interim order for temporary approval to keep dog within lot – whether warranted in circumstances. Act, ss 169, 180(7), 279.
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.